Lost in London
- warm
- brisk
- gentle
- intimate
Warm, kinetic, gentle comedy / drama, inventive in texture. Ambivalent, intimate, measured, hand-scored across twelve axes of taste.
How every film is hand-scored →Within the course of a night, Woody Harrelson finds himself in a misadventure in London that winds him up in prison.
Our read · Lost in London (2017) reads as a warm, kinetic, inventive comedy · drama entry — gentle in intensity, intimate in scope, measured in temperature, ambivalent in outlook. Hand-scored on twelve axes of taste — mood, pacing, weirdness, hope, stakes, humour, reality, density, warmth, auteur, intensity, and era — with a derived palette drawn from its dominant cinematography.
More info & search links
The shape of Lost in London
What watching it is actually like.
“You want a shaggy, real-time one-take celebrity misadventure full of charm and self-mockery.”
Skip it tonight — You want tight editing, high stakes, or anything that feels heavily scripted.
The reading.
Each axis is hand-scored — not derived from votes or genre averages. The marker shows where this film sits; the gradient fill uses the film's own cinematography palette.
Eight films that read most like this one.
Closeness in the twelve-axis space — how the film actually reads, not “people also liked.”
Discussion
What does your Movie DNA look like?
Rate a few films you've seen. We map your taste across the same twelve axes and find the films you'll actually want to watch tonight.
Calibrate yourself