Birdemic 2: The Resurrection
- warm
- kinetic
- surreal
- cold
- funny
Warm, breathless, measured horror / thriller, surreal in texture. Ambivalent, mid-stakes, cold, hand-scored across twelve axes of taste.
How every film is hand-scored →A platoon of eagles and vultures attack Hollywood, California. Why did the eagles and vultures attack? Who will survive?
Our read · Birdemic 2: The Resurrection (2013) reads as a warm, breathless, surreal horror · thriller entry — measured in intensity, mid-stakes in scope, cold in temperature, ambivalent in outlook. Hand-scored on twelve axes of taste — mood, pacing, weirdness, hope, stakes, humour, reality, density, warmth, auteur, intensity, and era — with a derived palette drawn from its dominant cinematography.
More info & search links
The shape of Birdemic 2
What watching it is actually like.
“You want gloriously bad so-bad-it's-good bird attack satire with self-aware sequeling.”
Skip it tonight — You want competent craft or anything you can't laugh at for the wrong reasons.
The reading.
Each axis is hand-scored — not derived from votes or genre averages. The marker shows where this film sits; the gradient fill uses the film's own cinematography palette.
Eight films that read most like this one.
Closeness in the twelve-axis space — how the film actually reads, not “people also liked.”
Discussion
What does your Movie DNA look like?
Rate a few films you've seen. We map your taste across the same twelve axes and find the films you'll actually want to watch tonight.
Calibrate yourself